翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Mt. Carmel Presbyterian Church (Covington, Tennessee)
・ Mt. Carmel School and Church
・ Mt. Cuba Center
・ Mt. Desolation
・ Mt. Desolation (album)
・ Mt. Echo Park
・ Mt. Eden Formation
・ Mt. Egypt
・ Mt. Elgon Constituency
・ Mt. Ennon Baptist Church
・ Mt. Fuji Records
・ Mt. Gilead Baptist Church
・ Mt. Gokurakuji
・ Mt. Gox
・ Mt. Hakkoda (2014 film)
Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle
・ Mt. Hebron M.E. Church South and Cemetery
・ Mt. Helium
・ Mt. Hood Community College
・ Mt. Hood Independent Film Festival
・ Mt. Hood Jazz Festival
・ Mt. Hope Airport
・ Mt. Hope Family Center
・ Mt. Hope High School
・ Mt. Horeb Opera Block
・ Mt. Horeb Presbyterian Church and Cemetery
・ Mt. Lebanon (PAT station)
・ Mt. Lebanon School District
・ Mt. Lebanon Township, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania
・ Mt. Lebanon Tunnel


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle : ウィキペディア英語版
Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle

''Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle'', 429 U.S. 274, often shortened to ''Mt. Healthy v. Doyle'', was a unanimous 1977 U.S. Supreme Court decision arising from a fired teacher's lawsuit against his former employer, the Mount Healthy City Schools. The Court considered three issues: whether federal-question jurisdiction existed in the case, whether the Eleventh Amendment barred federal lawsuits against school districts, and whether the First and Fourteenth Amendments prevented the district, as a government agency, from firing or otherwise disciplining an employee for constitutionally protected speech on a matter of public concern where the same action might have taken place for other, unprotected activities. Justice William Rehnquist wrote the opinion.
The case was first heard in the Southern District of Ohio. In 1971, Fred Doyle, who had been teaching social studies for five years in the Mount Healthy City Schools, learned his contract had not been renewed, not only denying him tenure but any further employment with the district. The superintendent's letter cited both an incident where he had made an obscene gesture to students and his sharing of a district dress code for teachers with a local radio station as displaying a "lack of tact". He took a position with another district and filed suit under Section 1983, arguing his constitutional rights to free speech had been violated, per the Court's 1967 decision in ''Pickering v. Board of Education'', another case involving an untenured teacher fired for speaking out in the media. After the district court ruled in his favor, the school district appealed to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, which partially vacated the decision in a brief ''per curiam'' opinion late in 1975.
The Supreme Court took the case and heard oral argument almost a year later. It handed down its decision early in 1977. On the jurisdictional question, Rehnquist held that although the school district had been created by state law, it was primarily a local entity and thus beyond the reach of the Eleventh Amendment, its first ruling in that area in 86 years.〔Harwood, Anthony J.; "(A Narrow Eleventh Amendment Immunity for Political Subdivisions: Reconciling The Arm of the State Doctrine with Federalist Principles )"; 55 Fordham L. Rev 101, 105 (1986). Retrieved February 5, 2014.〕 The Court did not, however, decide the question of whether Doyle had been fired legally, since there were other incidents suggesting he had difficulties in his relationships with students and fellow teachers which the district had introduced into the record. Instead, it remanded the case to the district court, ordering it to require the district to show by a preponderance of evidence that Doyle would have been fired regardless if he had not contacted the radio station. The school district was later able to do so, and in 1982 the Sixth Circuit upheld that decision.
The case introduced what has since become known as the "''Mt. Healthy'' test" into similar cases that follow the ''Pickering'' line in asserting the First Amendment rights of public employees where the employer claims other, unprotected conduct motivated the adverse action, a two-prong process that shifts the burden of proof from plaintiff to defendant in the course of the action. First, the plaintiff must prove that the activity they were allegedly disciplined for was indeed protected speech. The defendant must then show by a preponderance that the adverse action would have occurred if the protected activity had never happened. This has been criticized as allowing public employers a way to circumvent restrictions on taking adverse action against whistleblowers, and more generally as incompatible with the underlying principles of tort law. The test has also been expanded into mixed motive discrimination cases in employment law.
==Underlying dispute==

Doyle had begun teaching in Mt. Healthy, Ohio, a suburb of Cincinnati, in 1966. His one-year contract with the school system was renewed three times; in 1969 the contract term was extended to two years. Were it to be renewed, Doyle also expected to be granted tenure and commit to teaching at Mt. Healthy for the long term.〔''Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle'', , Rehnquist, J.〕
During the 1970 school year, he served as president of the school's Teachers' Association, and worked to expand the subjects of negotiations between it and the school board. The following year he was on the association's executive board. During this time relations between the association and the board were reportedly very tense, and Doyle was at the center of several incidents during 1970. As the Court recounted them:
In February 1971 the principal circulated a memo to all employees outlining a new dress code, apparently motivated by the administration's belief that public support for the district's bond issues was in part motivated by the teachers' appearance. Doyle, as an association official, had been aware that the administration was considering such a measure but had been led to believe that the association would have had some input before it was announced. He thus shared the memo with a friend at Cincinnati radio station WSAI, which used it as the basis for an on-air news item.〔''Mt. Healthy'' at 283.〕
Doyle later apologized to the principal, saying he should have expressed his concerns over the administration's handling of the issue privately before making the memo public. A month later the district's superintendent made his annual recommendations to the board on whether to renew the contracts of untenured faculty. Doyle was one of nine whom he did not recommend rehiring, and the board accepted the recommendations and voted not to renew the contracts, denying Doyle tenure and terminating his employment with the Mt. Healthy schools.〔
Doyle asked for a reason he had not been rehired, and later received a short written note. The board cited his "notable lack of tact in handling professional matters which leaves much doubt as to your sincerity in establishing good school relationships." It pointed to two specific instances of this: his obscene gesture to the girls in the cafeteria and his leaking of the dress-code memo〔 which "raised much concern not only within this community, but also in neighboring communities."〔''Mt. Healthy'' at 283n1.〕

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.